Legal Opinion

Virkshus v. Virkshus

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1947PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

The action was brought to foreclose two mortgages, a first of $3,000 and a second of $10,000, and the allegations of the complaint are sufficient to show right of foreclosure by the plaintiff. Judgment of foreclosure was entered on motion of the plaintiff for a summary judgment. The de fendants appeal on the ground that the pleadings and affidavits in support of and in opposition to the motion disclose triable issues of fact.

There are two motions for a summary judgment, the first dated December 7, 1945, based on the original complaint and the answer thereto and an affidavit in support of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stott v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Clemens v. ClemensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Harvey v. HarveyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Baierl v. RieseneckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Federal Trust Co. v. Bristol County Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mitchell Bank v. SchankeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Edwards v. PetroneCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
  3. Schwartz v. Evangelical Deaconess Society of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. TaggartWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Security National Bank v. CohenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API