Legal Opinion

Baierl v. Riesenecker

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1930PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed October 8, 1929:

Stevens, J.

The personal property here in question was in the possession of the mortgagors at the time that the *456defendants’ bill of sale was given. Secs. 241.08 and 241.10 of the Statutes provide: “No mortgage of personal property shall be valid against any other person than the parties thereto unless the possession of the mortgaged property be delivered to and retained by the mortgagee or unless the mortgage or a copy thereof be filed . . : in the office of the clerk of the town, city or village where the mortgagor resides.”

At the time the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cappon v. O'DayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Howard v. ChaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  3. Nixv v. WiswellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  4. First National Bank of Edgerton v. BiedermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Holak v. SouthardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Schneck v. Mutual Service Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Harte v. City of Eagle RiverWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Ronald Burzlaff v. Thoroughbred Motorsports IncorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  4. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. TaggartWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Virkshus v. VirkshusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API