Legal Opinion

Sacramento Police Officers Ass'n v. Venegas

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 3, 2002No. C030428PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SCOTLAND, P. J.

The Sacramento Police Officers Association and police officer Michael B. Kime appeal from a judgment denying their petition for a writ of mandate against Arturo Venegas, Jr., as Chief of Police, and the City of Sacramento. The interests of the Sacramento Police Officers Association and of Kime are unified; thus, for convenience, we will refer to their positions as those of Kime. The interests of Venegas and of the City of Sacramento are unified and, in fact, are the interests of Kime’s employer, the Sacramento City Police Department (the Department); for convenience, we…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pasadena Police Officers Assn. v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Caloca v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. County of Riverside v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Aguilar v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Poole v. Orange County Fire AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Seligsohn v. DayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. Paterson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. McMahon v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API