Legal Opinion
PANG
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 1965No. 1479PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Interim Decision *1479 Meal= or PANG* In Deportation Proceedings A-15169531 Decided by Board Arno 9,1965 (1) Authority exists under sections 235, 287(a) and 287(b), /mmigmtion and Nationality Act, for a Service officer to interrogate or take evidence T/0111 an alien as to his right to remain in the United States, and respondent's pre- hearing sworn statement made voluntarily and withont_requesk: for kepre- • entaiobycuslfreanivtgohSercisadmblIn evidence in deportation proceedings (8 DIM 20.14(0) f Is not in violation of .due process or fair hearing; and is not bound by Judicial rules of evi- dence…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Marcello v. BondsSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- United States Ex Rel. Impastato v. O'rourke, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
- Williams v. ButterfieldDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- SANDOVALBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1979
- BENITEZBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1984
- EXANTUS AND PIERREBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1977
- SCAVOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1973
- FUENTES-BLANCOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1968