Legal Opinion
Smith v. Smith
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 6, 1939No. 31,915PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Julius J. Olson, Justice.
Plaintiffs have appealed from an order sustaining defendants’ general demurrer to the first cause of action pleaded in their complaint. As this case and the involved pleading were here before, State ex rel. Smith v. District Court, 202 Minn. 75, 77, 277 N. W. 353, 354, and the facts being there fully stated, we shall refrain from repeating them. They are as therein summarized.
The issue to be determined in that case was whether the action was one involving title to real estate, in which event the place of trial was Hennepin county, or, if it was a transitory action,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. DahlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Lace v. FixenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Tuder v. Oregon Short Line RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Cashman v. . ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- State Ex Rel. Smith v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Robinson v. ButlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Schimmelpfennig v. GaedkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Anderson v. Minnesota Insurance Guaranty Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Nostdal v. County of WatonwanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Kangas-Jacobsen Dairy, Inc. v. Lloyd-SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.