State Ex Rel. Smith v. District Court
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Per curiam
Order to show cause why a peremptory writ of mandamus should not issue to change the place of trial from the county of Brown to the county of Hennepin. The venue was laid in Hennepin county, but on motion of defendants, residents of Brown county, the court, Winfield W. Bardwell, Judge, ordered the venue changed to Brown county. Plaintiffs claim the action to be local, defendants that it is transitory. If the latter, the writ should be denied. The complaint must furnish the basis for the decision. The substance thereof may be stated thus:
On West Lake street and James avenue in Minneapolis…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Nyquist v. District Court of Swift CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- State ex rel. D. S. B. Johnston Land Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- State Ex Rel. Goodin v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- State ex rel. Lijeski v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Quinn v. Butler BrothersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Yess v. FerchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Granite Falls Municipal Hospital v. ColeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Marion v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953