Legal Opinion

People v. Nappo

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1930No. Docket No. 159, Calendar No. 34,475PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

The objection that the information was not verified as required by the statute then in force, section 40, chap. 7, Act No. 175, Pub. Acts 1927 (see Act No. 24, Pub. Acts 1929, amending Act No. 175), made after jury was sworn, came too late. Lambert v. People, 29 Mich. 71.

Defendant’s remaining meritorious assignment of error in review of judgment upon conviction of larceny of shoes and other articles, valued at $104.15 of Ernst Kern Company in Detroit, is that the evidence- against her was procured in violation of her constitutional right to be secure against unreasonable searches and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. KamhoutMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  2. People v. MargelisMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Lambert v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  4. People v. StewartMichigan Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. PankninMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. People v. OrlandoMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  3. In Re ElliottMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  4. People Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Lansing Municipal JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  5. People v. BonneauMichigan Supreme Court · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API