Legal Opinion

People v. Woods

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 15, 1937No. Crim. 2955PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrail, P. J.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of rape and sentenced to the state prison. The issues under his pleas of “not guilty” and “not guilty by reason of insanity” were separately tried in one trial, the jury returning successive verdicts of “guilty” and “sane”. This appeal is taken from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial and from-the judgment.

It is first contended by defendant that the court committed prejudicial error in refusing to permit a voir dire examination of the jury when the issue of sanity was reached. The same jury tried the issue as to defendant’s guilt and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. WillardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Estate of SextonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. People v. Leong FookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Russell v. RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  5. People v. SloperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. WeinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. People v. GorshenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. People v. RuppCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. In Re Cheryl H.California Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Burgunder v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1940

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API