Legal Opinion

State v. Simenson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 18, 1935No. 30,493PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

I. M. Olsen, Justice.

The defendant appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial. He was charged, in an information filed by the county attorney, with having, on April 10, 1934, at the city of Pipestone, stolen and carried away from a building in said city, in the nighttime, a number of automobile tires and tubes and certain containers full of lubricating oil, all of the reasonable aggregate value of $100, the charge being grand larceny in the first degree. Defendant pleaded not guilty. He was tried on said information in the district court of Pipestone county on the 13th and 14th…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gray v. First Division of the St. Paul & Pacific R. R.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1868
  2. Jenness v. School District No. 31, Washington Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1867
  3. State v. ScottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  4. Thoreson v. QuinnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  5. Judd v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Pearson v. Probate CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  2. State v. RawlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  3. State v. FinnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  4. State v. LittleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  5. State v. DhaemersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API