Gray v. First Division of the St. Paul & Pacific R. R.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
The defendant removes this cause from the District Court of Iiennepin County to this Court, by an appeal taken from an order of that Court overruling a demurrer, which the defendant had interposed to the plaintiff’s complaint. The complaint, and the demurrer thereto, both sufficiently appear in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Beret, J".
By the Court In the complaint in this action the plaintiff alleges that on the 18th day of August, 1866, he was, ever since has been, and still is, the owner in fee of certain lands situate in Minneapolis, subject only to the public easement of a common street or highway, on a portion of the same, said portion being a part of Dakota street, adjoining the other lands of tbe plaintiff; that prior to said 18th day of August, 1866, one Hoag, being tbe owner of land comprising Dakota street, did voluntarily and gratuitously dedicate tbe land comprising Dakota street to the use and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bloodgood v. Mohawk & Hudson RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1837
- Schurmeier v. St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1865
- Powers v. BearsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
3Cited by29 opinions
- Hunt v. Nevada State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- G., C. & S. F. R'y Co. v. FullerTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- Visina v. FreemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- State v. CantienySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- State v. RawlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.