Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided March 25, 2019No. 3:17-cv-1561 (JAM)PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jeffrey Alker Meyer, United States District Judge

This is an ERISA case about what it means for an insurance company to give a "full and fair" review of a claim for disability benefits. The defendant insurance company terminated plaintiff's disability benefits, once on an initial review and then again after plaintiff filed for an internal appeal review. But while the internal appeal was pending, the insurance company hired a doctor to examine plaintiff, and the doctor then sent the insurance company a report of his findings. Despite plaintiff's request, the insurance company did not give…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. John Halpin v. W.W. Grainger, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Jette v. United of Omaha Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
  2. Crites v. Aetna Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2020
  3. Elias v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2023
  4. Hughes v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
  5. Hughes v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API