Cain v. City Court of Tucson
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HATHAWAY, Judge.
The defendant, charged with DWI in the Tucson City Court, filed a notice of change of judge pursuant to 17 A.R.S., Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 10.2. The request was denied. A petition for special action to review the denial was filed in the superior court and denied. This appeal followed.
Rule 10.2 affords a peremptory change of judge in superior court. In Anagnostos v. Truman, 25 Ariz.App. 190, 541 P.2d 1174 (1975), we held that the rule specifically allowed the peremptory challenge of a judge only at the superior court level and not in the city court. Appellant…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- North v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Palmer v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1977
- Anagnostos v. TrumanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cain v. City Court of City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Cain v. City Court of City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Cain v. City Court of City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1983