Legal Opinion

Cain v. City Court of Tucson

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 28, 1982No. 2 CA-CIV 4268PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HATHAWAY, Judge.

The defendant, charged with DWI in the Tucson City Court, filed a notice of change of judge pursuant to 17 A.R.S., Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 10.2. The request was denied. A petition for special action to review the denial was filed in the superior court and denied. This appeal followed.

Rule 10.2 affords a peremptory change of judge in superior court. In Anagnostos v. Truman, 25 Ariz.App. 190, 541 P.2d 1174 (1975), we held that the rule specifically allowed the peremptory challenge of a judge only at the superior court level and not in the city court. Appellant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. North v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Palmer v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Anagnostos v. TrumanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cain v. City Court of City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Cain v. City Court of City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Cain v. City Court of City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API