Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cain v. City Court of City of Tucson

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1983No. 16261-PRPublished

1DissentHays, Justice

According to the majority, we, in the ivory towers of appellate “never-never land,” have a new standard with which to test constraints of procedural law. The beautifully subjective standard is fairness. From now on, the law will be administered with fairness, even if a few hard cases make bad law. No need for this court to supply rules where rules are lacking, for all we have to do is apply the fairness test.

I am well aware that I authored State ex rel. Purcell v. City Court of Phoenix, 112 Ariz. 517, 543 P.2d 1146 (1975), which established this fairness standard. However, I would rather see…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Purcell v. City Ct. of City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Cain v. City Court of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API