Legal Opinion
Cain v. City Court of City of Tucson
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided February 15, 1983No. 16261-PRPublished
1Opinion of the Court
135 Ariz. 96 (1983)
659 P.2d 649
Germaine CAIN, Petitioner/Appellant,
v.
The CITY COURT OF the CITY OF TUCSON, Pima County, State of Arizona; Bram Goldman, City Magistrate; and Hon. James M. Wilkes, Judge Pro Tempore of Superior Court of the State of Arizona, Respondent, and OFFICE OF the CITY PROSECUTOR, Real Party in Interest/Appellee.
No. 16261-PR.
Supreme Court of Arizona, In Banc.
February 15, 1983.
Stephen Paul Barnard, Tucson, for petitioner/appellant.
Frederick S. Dean, City Atty. by R. William Call and Tobin Rosen, Asst. City Attys., Tucson, for real party in interest/appellee.
CAMERON,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Palmer v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1977
- Huggins v. DeinhardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- State Ex Rel. Purcell v. City Ct. of City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1975
- Cain v. City Court of City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Anagnostos v. TrumanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.