Legal Opinion
Munoz v. New Jersey Automobile Full Insurance Underwriting Ass'n
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided July 15, 1996PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
COLEMAN, J.
The question common to these three appeals is whether a notice of cancellation of automobile insurance coverage due to the policyholder’s failure to pay premiums must post-date the premium due date, thereby allowing the policyholder a fifteen-day grace period before coverage expires. Plaintiffs failed to make payment and were consequently denied coverage by their respective carriers for accidents occurring after the putative cancellation dates.
The trial court found there was coverage for the accidents in two of the three cases. The Appellate…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Merin v. MaglakiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- State v. ButlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- Young v. Schering Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Amerada Hess Corp. v. Director, Division of Taxation, New Jersey Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- In Re the Closing of Jamesburg High SchoolSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Conklin v. WeismanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- Brooks v. OdomSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- Coalition for Quality Health Care v. DEPT. OF BANKING & INS.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
- MacKey v. Bristol West Insurance Service of California, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Yacko v. CurtisAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.