Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Riverside Joint Venture v. Missouri Gaming Commission
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided May 29, 1998No. 80524, 80525, 80624, 80625PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Per curiam
In Akin v. Missouri Gaming Commission, 956 S.W.2d 261 (Mo. banc 1997), this Court declared that article III, section 39(e) of the Missouri Constitution did not authorize games of chance in gambling facilities floating in artificial basins not “upon the Mississippi River and Missouri River.”
Following this Court’s decision in Akin, the Missouri Gaming Commission notified the respondents/cross-appellants, Riverside Joint Venture; Harrah’s Maryland Heights, LLC; Harrah’s Maryland Heights Corporation; Harrah’s North Kansas City Corporation; Players MH, LP; Boyd Kansas City, Inc; and Kansas City…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Chassaing v. MummertSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
- Farm Bureau Town & Country Insurance Co. v. AngoffSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
- State Ex Rel. Noranda Aluminum, Inc. v. RainsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
- Bodenhausen v. Missouri Board of Registration for the Healing ArtsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
- State Ex Rel. Richardson v. RandallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Rosenberg v. JarrettMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- Teague v. Missouri Gaming CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- State Ex Rel. Frets v. MooreMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
- State Ex Rel. AG Processing Inc. v. ThompsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- Ferrellgas, L.P. v. WilliamsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.