Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Richardson v. Randall

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 22, 1983No. 65061PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GUNN, Judge.

Relator seeks a writ of prohibition to prevent having to disclose the name of a handwriting expert retained by her or her counsel for her defense against forgery charges. The respondent trial court ordered disclosure of the expert’s name and address. Relator’s efforts for relief have brought her to this Court which has issued a preliminary rule in prohibition.

The issue is whether a criminal defendant must divulge the name and address of an expert with whom she has consulted but does not intend to use at trial. Lying in the heart of this case is Rule 25.06(A) and the reasonableness…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Morasch v. KimberlinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  2. State v. CarterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  3. State Ex Rel. Hannah v. SeierSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  4. State v. HardinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. State ex rel. Ken Reynolds Pharmacies, Inc. v. PyleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Chassaing v. MummertSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  2. State Ex Rel. Douglas Toyota III, Inc. v. KeeterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  3. State Ex Rel. Faith Hospital v. EnrightSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  4. State Ex Rel. St. Louis Housing Authority v. GaertnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  5. State Ex Rel. Riverside Joint Venture v. Missouri Gaming CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API