Hudson v. Mastercraft Division, Collins & Aikman Corp.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge.
In the present case, there is no dispute that plaintiff sustained a compensable injury. The parties contend on appeal, however, that the Commission erred in determining the extent to which plaintiff is entitled to compensation for temporary and permanent disability as a result of her injury. Their contentions have merit and require that we remand the case for additional findings with respect to both questions.
Appellate review of a decision of the Industrial Commission is limited to a determination of whether or not there is competent evidence to support the Commission’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Click v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Hansel v. Sherman TextilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Schofield v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Moretz v. Richards & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Crawley v. Southern Devices, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Forrest v. Pitt County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Braswell v. Pitt County Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- Roberts v. ABR Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Braswell v. Pitt County Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- Forrest v. Pitt County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990