Legal Opinion
Bellini v. Neas
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Decided June 27, 1929PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarrows, J.
Certain lots of real estate, some with buildings thereon, in Providence were conveyed to Mariangela but actually were paid for by her husband, James Bellini. The property was deeded to her November 18, 1925, by one Rosa and there was evidence that it was worth as much as $27,000.
Just prior to the conveyance, one Neas and one Cecea had sold and delivered merchandise to Rosa, who had no other property, and credit had been given on the strength of Rosa’s ownership of said real estate. The real estate was mortgaged for $15,000 and Rosa was found by the trial court to have been indebted to Bellini…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sims v. GainesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
- Wetherill v. CanneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- McKey v. CochranIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
- Macomber v. PeckSupreme Court of Iowa · 1874
- Sandlin v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hill v. M. S. Alper & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1969
- Kane v. Sesac, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1943
- Gregory v. Pawtucket Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1937
- Temple Terrace Assets Co. v. WasonSupreme Court of Florida · 1935