Legal Opinion
Kane v. Sesac, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 15, 1943PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES ALGER FEE, District Judge.
The facts which give rise to this litigation are labyrinthian. As succinct a statement thereof as possible will be given in the following paragraphs.
Thomas F. Kane, plaintiff, who has been an author’s representative and who, the record shows, is a money lender, has been an associate and client of Abner J. Rubien since 1925: He loaned money to Rubien at all periods in substantial amounts. Abner J. Rubien and Isidor Bregoff became partners in the legal firm of Rubien & Bregoff in New York City in 1929. One of the assets of the firm was a contract, dated April 7,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Benedict v. RatnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Matter of Co-Operative Law Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910
- American Surety Co. v. ConnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Glenny v. LangdonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Adler v. FentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Norman v. ARCS Equities Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- Blumenstein v. Phillips Insurance Center, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1971
- Richman v. LeiserMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
- Mission Bay Campland, Inc. v. Sumner Financial Corp.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1976
- 381651 Alberta, Ltd. v. 279298 ALBERTADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.