Legal Opinion
Clark v. Clune
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided October 7, 1912No. Docket No. 74PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Error to Cheboygan; Shepherd, J. Assumpsit by Orange M. Clark against John H. Clune for breach óf a contract of guaranty. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.
Plaintiff brought this suit against de*324fendant to recover upon a certain guaranty given to him by defendant in writing, as follows:
“ For a valuable consideration to me paid, I do hereby guaranty the payment by said Charles M. Robinson of all of the notes, accounts, dues and demands against said co-partnership of Orange M. Clark and Charles M. Robinson, now existing.
“Dated, Cheboygan, Michigan, this 8th day of December, 1904.”
This guaranty was on the back of a written dissolution of a partnership known as the Robinson Towing Company, between the plaintiff and Robinson, whereby ,plaintiff, in…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Grant v. MaslenMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. PaulkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- National Surety Co. v. LoveNebraska Supreme Court · 1921