Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Paulk

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 14, 1929No. 3628PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.

(after stating the facts as above). The assignments of error present, in effect, the point in view that the right of appellant to recover on the contract of indemnity and the liability of the appellees to pay was conclusively established upon the proof, which was undisputed, of the rendition of the judgment in evidence and the payment of it by the appellant, and that the court erred in holding otherwise. An inspection of the indemnity bond given by appellees clearly reveals' that they covenanted as follows:

“At all times hereafter (to) save harmless and keep indemnified the United States…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McCamant v. RobertsTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Browne v. FrenchCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893
  3. Illies v. FitzgeraldTexas Supreme Court · 1854
  4. National Surety Co. v. LoveNebraska Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Clark v. CluneMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Howze v. Surety Corp. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Brownsville & Matamoros Bridge Co. v. NullCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. Reavis v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  4. Old Republic Surety Co. v. Bonham State Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2005
  5. Baker v. Guaranty National Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API