Legal Opinion

Costanzo v. Harris

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1967No. 38747PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stafford, J. †

This is an appeal from a summary judgment.

There is substantial agreement on the following facts: On May 8, 1961, Frank Costanzo and wife (hereinafter referred to as the appellants) sold a 1,200 acre farm to Norman Harris and wife (hereinafter referred to as the respondents). The respondents paid $16,000 on a total purchase price of $60,844.71. They executed a note for the balance and secured it by a purchase money mortgage.

Thereafter, respondents suffered financial reverses. On January 15, 1962, they filed a declaration of homestead on the entire farm. The declaration asserted…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. FIRST NAT. BANK ETC. v. TiffanyWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  2. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. WagnerWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Traverso v. CeriniWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  4. State Ex Rel. Bond v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Aronson v. MurkWashington Supreme Court · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Klossner v. San Juan CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  2. Bank of Anacortes v. CookCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  3. George Maroun, Sr. & a. v. Deutsche Bank National Trust CompanySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
  4. Security Savings & Loan Ass'n v. BuschWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  5. In Re West Chestnut Realty of Haverford, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API