Legal Opinion

Aronson v. Murk

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1965No. 37422PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.

— This is an appeal from a judgment for plaintiff enjoining defendant from satisfying a judgment from the surplus equity in real property over and above the statutory $6,000 homestead exemption. The dispute involves the legal significance of the following sequence of events:(1) January 9, 1956, Louis and Cecelia Aronson filed a valid declaration of homestead on their residence property in Seattle. This property was held as community property.(2) In 1958, the Aronsons moved to Alaska to live.(3) December 10, 1958, Ebba Murk and Ragnar Murk were granted judgment by the Superior Court for King…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Traders' National Bank v. SchorrWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Lien v. HoffmanWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Barouh v. IsraelWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Becher v. ShawWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Locke v. CollinsWashington Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mahalko v. Arctic Trading Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Costanzo v. HarrisWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Mahalko v. Arctic Trading Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  4. Erickson v. Wenner (In Re Wenner)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · 1984
  5. American Northwest Distributors Inc v. Four Roses Distillery LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API