Legal Opinion
Traverso v. Cerini
Washington Supreme Court
Decided January 6, 1928No. 20786. Department TwoPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
The appellant, Traverso, holding an unsatisfied judgment against the respondents, Peter Y. Cerini and Santina Cerini, his wife, entered in the superior court of Bang county, caused a general execution to issue thereon, and caused the execution to be levied upon certain real property situated in the county named, and owned by the respondents. The officer having the writ in execution advertised the property for sale, fixing the time of the sale as of April 16, 1927.
On July 23, 1924, the respondent wife had filed a declaration of homestead under the state law, and on April 12, 1927, filed a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Whitworth v. McKeeWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- Krutz v. BattsWashington Supreme Court · 1898
- Snelling v. ButlerWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Harding v. Atlantic Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901
- Kenyon v. ErskineWashington Supreme Court · 1912
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re Krause's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- Clark v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1951
- In Re RobertsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
- City of Seattle v. LongWashington Supreme Court · 2021
- Locke v. CollinsWashington Supreme Court · 1953
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.