Legal Opinion

Grooms v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 11, 1983No. 81-448, 81-447PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a boundary line case. We affirm.

Plaintiffs James B. Mitchell and James H. Mitchell acquired title to certain real property located in Madison County on 6 November 1980. The north boundary of that property caused the controversy which resulted in the filing of these suits in the nature of ejectment under § 6-6-280, et seq., Code 1975. The Mitchells are record title holders of land bounded on the North by the North line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 32, Township 5, Range 2 East in Madison County, Alabama. Defendant Sam W. Grooms, Jr., owns adjoining land…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lay v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
  2. Nelson v. GarrardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  3. Smith v. NelsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  4. Kirby v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  5. Rutland v. Georgia Kraft Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Tidwell v. StricklerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  2. Lilly v. PalmerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  3. Seidler v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  4. Henderson v. DunnCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001
  5. Powell v. EvansSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API