Legal Opinion

Sonogram of New England, Inc. v. Amica Insurance

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided August 12, 2002PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Merrick, RJ.

Plaintiff Sonogram of New England, Inc. (“Sonogram”) is a New Hampshire corporation engaged in the business of ultrasound tests and, particularly, musculoskeletal diagnosis by means of such tests. The specific ultrasound test here, a sonogram, apparently produces a picture of a body part or organ on a screen by bouncing sound waves off it See Bradford v. Baystate Med. Center, 415 Mass. 202, 210-212 (1993). According to its New Hampshire Articles of Organization, Sonogram was established to “provide the service of diagnostic musculoskel-etal ultrasound.” Those Articles state that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. MoserSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Beal v. Board of SelectmenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  3. Fidler v. E. M. Parker Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  4. Miles v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  5. Tausevich v. Board of Appeals of StoughtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sonogram of New England, Inc. v. Plymouth Rock Assurance Corp.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2002
  2. Campbell v. TonerMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API