Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Toner

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided February 6, 2003PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreco, J.

This is a Dist./Mun. Cts. R. A. D. A, Rule 8C, appeal of the entry of summary judgment in favor of the defendant on the plaintiff-attorney’s complaint to recover legal fees.

Plaintiff Diana Butt Campbell (“Campbell”) alleged that she was hired by defendant Nancy C. Toner (‘Toner”) to provide legal services to Toner in conjunction with the probate of the estate of Toner’s aunt. Toner, who had been appointed executrix of that estate, signed a Retainer Agreement in which she, in her individual capacity, agreed to pay Campbell for Campbell’s “time and services extended on [Toner’s] behalf.”…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jarosz v. PalmerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  2. Miles v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  3. Hayden v. HaydenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  4. Eaton v. WalkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  5. Tausevich v. Board of Appeals of StoughtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Campbell v. TonerMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2006
  2. Campbell v. TonerMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API