Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Freeling v. Sullivan

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 28, 1920No. 11329PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from District Court, Greer County; Arthur G. Sutton, Assigned Judge. Quo warranto by the State, on the relation of S. P. Freeling, Attorney General, against J. IT. Sullivan and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

This is an appeal from the district court of Greer county, Hon. Arthur Sutton, Judge.

This action is a proceeding in the nature of quo warranto commenced in the name of the state of Oklahoma,. on the relation of S. P. Freeling,. Attorney General, against the defendants in error, seeking to invalidate the formation of consolidated school district No. 7 of said county, and the election of the defendants as officers of the consolidated district.

Pursuant to petitions filed with the county superintendent of public instruction by the voters of each of common school districts Nos. 30, 152, and 4, ho…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Town of Grove v. Haskell, GovernorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. City of Ardmore v. State Ex Rel. BestSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Ratliff v. State Ex Rel. WoodsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  4. North v. McMahanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  5. Lowe v. Consolidated School Dist. No. 97Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. McNeill v. LongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  2. Smith v. State Ex Rel. BarrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Ragan v. ShannonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Gammill v. ShackelfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  5. Reed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API