Legal Opinion

Ratliff v. State Ex Rel. Woods

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided August 10, 1920No. 11254PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Error from District Court, McClain County; F. B. Swank, Judge. Quo warranto by the state on the relation of W. H. Woods, county attorney of McClain county, against J. A. Ratliff and others, officers of Consolidated School District of Cole, to declare the organization of said district illegal. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcNEILL, J.

This was a proceeding in the nature of a quo warranto, brought by the state of Oklahoma ex rel. W. H. Woods, county attorney of McClain county, against J. A. Ratliff. O. A. Madden, and W. A. Harding to declare the organization of consolidated school district of Cole null and void. The petition alleged the organization of the district was illegal for several reasons. The material allegations are contained in paragraph 10 of the petition, which alleged that certain citizens of Ross district No. 6, which is embraced in the consolidated district, did not receive any notice of the election, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Town of Grove v. Haskell, GovernorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. McCarty v. CainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Hughes v. City of SapulpaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In Re East Bay Etc. Water Bonds of 1925California Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Associated Industries v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Ruth v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. McLoughlin v. City of PrescottArizona Supreme Court · 1931
  5. State Ex Rel. McNeill v. LongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API