State v. Romage
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*391Lanzinger, J.
{¶ 1} In this case, we must determine the constitutionality of R.C. 2905.05(A), Ohio’s statute that defines the crime of child enticement. We hold that the statute is unconstitutional and affirm the judgment of the Tenth District Court of Appeals.
I. Introduction
{¶ 2} Appellee, Jason Romage, was charged with criminal child enticement, a violation of R.C. 2905.05(A). On October 18, 2010, a Columbus police officer filed a complaint in the Franklin County Municipal Court that alleged that Romage, “without privilege to do so, knowingly solicit[ed a] child under fourteen years of age *…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- City of Houston v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- State v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- State v. DelvallieOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- State v. WolfeOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. Mole (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. Aalim (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. LeetOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.