Legal Opinion

State v. Romage

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 2014No. 2012-1958 and 2012-2042PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*391Lanzinger, J.

{¶ 1} In this case, we must determine the constitutionality of R.C. 2905.05(A), Ohio’s statute that defines the crime of child enticement. We hold that the statute is unconstitutional and affirm the judgment of the Tenth District Court of Appeals.

I. Introduction

{¶ 2} Appellee, Jason Romage, was charged with criminal child enticement, a violation of R.C. 2905.05(A). On October 18, 2010, a Columbus police officer filed a complaint in the Franklin County Municipal Court that alleged that Romage, “without privilege to do so, knowingly solicit[ed a] child under fourteen years of age *…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. City of Houston v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. State v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. State v. DelvallieOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  2. State v. WolfeOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. State v. Mole (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  4. State v. Aalim (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  5. State v. LeetOhio Court of Appeals · 2020

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API