Legal Opinion
Hoe v. Knap
United States Circuit Court
Decided March 22, 1886PublishedCited by 10 opinions
In Equity.
1Opinion of the CourtBlodgett, J.
Complainants, by this bill, seek an injunction and accounting for tbe alleged infringement by defendants of three patents *205owned by complainants; the first being patent No. 269,159, granted December 12, 1882, to Luther C. Crowell, for “a sheet delivering mechanism for printing-machines;” the second being patent No. 211,-848, granted to Bichard M. Hoe, on February 4, 1879, for “an improvement in paper-folding machines;” and the third being reissued patent No. 8,801, granted to complainants as assignees of Bichard M. Hoe and Stephen D. Tucker, July 15, 1879, for an “improvement in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Miller v. Brass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Mahn v. HarwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Fay v. CordesmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Silsby v. FooteSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
3Cited by10 opinions
- Heaton-Peninsular Button-Fastener Co. v. Eureka Specialty Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
- Crown Cork & Seal Co. v. Aluminum Stopper Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1901
- Fuller v. BergerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1903
- Indiana Mfg. Co. v. J. I. Case Threshing Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1907
- Snow v. DuxstadWyoming Supreme Court · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.