Legal Opinion

Beckman v. Davidson

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 27, 1894PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Writ of entry, dated October 25,1893, to recover a parcel of land in Plymouth. Plea, nul disseisin. Trial in the Superior Court, without a jury, before Bishop, J., who found for the tenant; and the demandant alleged exceptions. The facts appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtKnowlton, J.

The question in dispute in this case is where is the boundary line between the two lots owned by the demand-ant and the tenant respectively, which are adjacent to each other on the easterly side of the same street. The tenant traces her title back to a deed to Jane Burgess, dated June 25, 1831, conveying “ a certain house lot in Plymouth aforesaid, at Hobb’s Hole, so called, bounded as follows: beginning at the westerly corner by road, thence north forty-two degrees east one hundred and forty-six feet by Joseph Whiting’s land to his corner, bounded thence south thirty-seven degrees east…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lovejoy v. LovettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  2. Dodd v. WittMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  3. Miles v. BarrowsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  4. Hathaway v. EvansMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  5. Coyle v. ClearyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bond v. O'GaraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  2. Gray v. KelleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  3. Ovans v. CastrucciMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  4. Peavey v. MoranMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  5. Wishart v. McKnightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API