Legal Opinion

Spaulding Et Ux. v. City of Rutland

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 3, 1939PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtles, J.

The plaintiffs in this suit in chancery seek a declaratory decree determinative of their rights, if any they have, under a certain tax exemption vote of the City of Rutland. At the annual city meeting held March 3, 1936, this question was regularly submitted to the voters for decision: “Shall any manufacturing establishment or establishments acquiring the property of the Yorke Shirt Company, situated on Cleveland Avenue in this city, and the machinery, capital and personal property used in such business, be exempted from taxation for a period of five (5) years, provided that employment be…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Nolan v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
  2. Vermont Marble Co. v. EastmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1917
  3. Young Men's Christian Ass'n v. Lancaster CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1921
  4. In re Hickok's EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1906
  5. Knox College v. Board of ReviewIllinois Supreme Court · 1923

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Thompson v. SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1957
  2. Turner v. BraggSupreme Court of Vermont · 1943
  3. First Nat'l B'k v. Comr. of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1940
  4. Scott v. LeonardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1956
  5. Cook v. HoldenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API