Legal Opinion

ANGELOPOULOS v. HDR ENGINEERING, INC.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 20, 2021No. 2:19-cv-01578Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CONSTANTINE ANGELOPOULOS, ) ) ) 2:19-CV-01578-CCW Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ) HDR ENGINEERING, INC., ) ) ) Defendant. ) OPINION Before the Court is Defendant HDR Engineering, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 45, and HDR’s Motion to Strike Section VIII of Plaintiff’s Opposition, ECF No. 54. Because the Court concludes that Plaintiff Constantine Angelopoulos has not met his burden of producing evidence to show pretext, HDR’s Motion for Summary Judgment will be GRANTED. Furthermore, because the Court will grant…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API