Legal Opinion

People v. Padillia

California Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1872No. 3,011PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, County of San Joaquin. The defendant was convicted of the crime of murder in the first degree. He moved for a ne.w trial, the motion was denied, and he appealed. The other facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Rhodes, J.:

The motion for a new trial was made on the ground, among others, that the evidence was insufficient to justify the verdict. ■ That question cannot be considered on the record now before us. The record contains no bill of exceptions. The only manner in which that question can be presented to the appellate Court is by a bill of exceptions—or a statement, as it is sometimes called—duly settled and certified by the Judge who tried the cause. In this case, the transcript contains a longhand copy of the notes of the official reporter, certified by him to be correct; but…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. CroninCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  2. People v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  3. People v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  4. People v. TrimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  5. People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. AndersonOregon Supreme Court · 1882
  2. People v. VereneseneckockockhoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. State v. NelsonNevada Supreme Court · 1876
  4. People v. FooCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. People v. MahoneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API