People v. Martin
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the County Court, Monterey County. The defendant was charged with and convicted of the crime of incest, and appealed. The other facts are stated in'the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Sawyer, J.:
There is in the record no bill of exceptions settled or signed, or in any way authenticated by the Judge, or otherwise. There- are a number of loose papers, not appearing to form parts of any one document, commencing with what purports to be a copy of the indictment, certified up by the Clerk. It is neither headed nor indorsed, or in any way designated as a bill of exceptions. The last paper in the series purports to state what took place on the trial, and terminates with a *92motion for a new trial. It is signed by the defendant’s attorney alone. This document is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. RighthouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- People v. StoneciferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
- People v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. SheldonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- People v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- People v. PadilliaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- People v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.