Legal Opinion
Rose v. Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided October 27, 2005No. SACV 05754JVSANXPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SELNA, District Judge.
I. BACKGROUND
Defendant Chase Manhattan Bank USA (“Chase”) moves for a judgment on the pleadings based on Plaintiffs’ Rose, Raitt, Abeyta, Reis (collectively “Rose”) First Amended Complaint.
In the first cause of action, Rose asserts three claims under California’s unfair competition law (“UCL”), Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200 et seq., on behalf of a putative class of California credit cardholders who accepted offers of convenience check loans from Chase on or after June 13, 2001. The main thrust of Rose’s claims is that Chase did not include information required by…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- English v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. FCCSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gff Corporation, an Oklahoma Corporation v. Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc., a Missouri CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Aguayo v. U.S. BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Rose v. Chase Bank USA, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Shame on You Productions, Inc. v. Elizabeth BanksDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Aguayo v. U.S. BankDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2009
- In re Novatel Wireless Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.