Legal Opinion
Rose v. Chase Bank USA, N.A.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 23, 2008No. 05-56850PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAER, Senior District Judge:
Plaintiffs-Appellants Denise Rose, Scott Raitt, Salvador Abeyta, and Lea Reis (“Plaintiffs”), ostensibly on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, appeal the district court’s grant of judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(c) to Defendant Chase Bank USA, N.A. (“Chase” or “Defendant”) on all claims. 1
We affirm the district court’s grant of judgment on the pleadings on all claims.
I. BACKGROUND
The following facts are taken from Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint and are taken as true for the purpose of reviewing a motion for judgment…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Watters v. Wachovia Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Barnett Bank of Marion County, N. A. v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Farmers' & Mechanics' National Bank v. DearingSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Veronica Gutierrez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Donald Lusnak v. Bank of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Cannon v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A.District Court, N.D. California · 2013
- United States v. City of ArcataCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Ellsworth v. U.S. Bank, N.A.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.