Legal Opinion
Prunty v. Vivendi
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 17, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2014-2073PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
■ Amit P, Mehta, United States District Judge
Pro se Plaintiff Robert Prunty brought this action against Defendants Vivendi SA; UMG Recordings, Inc.;, Atlantic Recording Corp.; ' The Island Def Jam Music Group; Warner Music Group Corp.;, and the law firm of Jenner & Block, LLP. 1 Am. Compl., ECF No. 6. Plaintiffs Complaint raises two sets of claims, which are the subject of Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss. 2 -.ECF Nos. 10,19.
Plaintiffs first set of claims arise from an adverse judgment entered against him in Prunté v. Universal Music Grp., 699 F.Supp.2d 15 (D.D.C.2010), aff'd,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Sturdza v. United Arab EmiratesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Busby v. Capital One, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Hall, Sheryl L. v. Clinton, Hillary R.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Prunty v. VivendiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Perfvwaybelayouix v. Graham-DrakeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022