Legal Opinion
Prunty v. Vivendi
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 1, 2016No. Civil No. 1:14-cv-02073 (APM)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Amit P. Mehta, United States District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
After prevailing on their Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint, Defendants Vivendi SA, UMG Recordings, Inc., and The Island Def Jam Music Group have moved for an award of attorney’s fees as to two categories of Plaintiffs claims: (1) his civil rights claims and (2) his copyright infringement claims. Defendants also seek an award for fees incurred in filing their Motion for Attorneys’ Fees. The court has carefully scrutinized Defendants’ Motion along with the supporting evidence. For the reasons explained…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Fox v. ViceSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dl v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Smith v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Spanski Enterprises, Inc. v. Telewizja Polska, S.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Brackett v. KellyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- Imapizza, LLC v. at Pizza LimitedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.