Legal Opinion

Antonsky v. City Dye House

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 12, 1909No. Nos. 16,088—(8)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from a judgment in justice court to the municipal court of St. Paul. From an order of the 'latter court, Hanft, J., granting the demand of defendant to transfer the action to the district court for Hennepin county, plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

From a judgment in justice court, defendant appealed upon questions of law and fact to the municipal court of St. Paul. Thereafter, defendant, acting under section 4100, R. L. 1905, properly made and filed an affidavit for a change of venue to the district court of Hennepin county, where it resided. Subsequently, and within the time provided by subdivision 2 of the statute referred to, the municipal court, *97upon application of defendant, made an order transferring the cause to Hennepin county. Plaintiff appealed from that order.

The order is not appealable, and defendant’s motion to dismiss the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. ComfortSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876
  2. Allis v. WhiteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Winegar v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API