Legal Opinion

Martinez v. Meek

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 25, 1976No. 6515PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WARD, Justice.

This is a medical malpractice case where at the conclusion of the plaintiff’s evidence the trial Court granted defendant’s motion for an instructed verdict and entered judgment for the doctor. A small clip or piece of metal was left in the defendant’s back in or near the spinal canal, either accidentally or intentionally, as a marker to show the location of a laminectomy. Legal sufficiency questions are raised as to negligence, fraudulent concealment and causation. We affirm.

On October 1, 1970, Nolberto Martinez injured his back while loading signs as a part of his…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Seideneck v. Cal Bayreuther AssociatesTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Bowles v. BourdonTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Hart v. Van ZandtTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Lenger v. Physician's General Hospital, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Duncan v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Portillo v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API