Martinez v. Meek
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WARD, Justice.
This is a medical malpractice case where at the conclusion of the plaintiff’s evidence the trial Court granted defendant’s motion for an instructed verdict and entered judgment for the doctor. A small clip or piece of metal was left in the defendant’s back in or near the spinal canal, either accidentally or intentionally, as a marker to show the location of a laminectomy. Legal sufficiency questions are raised as to negligence, fraudulent concealment and causation. We affirm.
On October 1, 1970, Nolberto Martinez injured his back while loading signs as a part of his…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Seideneck v. Cal Bayreuther AssociatesTexas Supreme Court · 1970
- Bowles v. BourdonTexas Supreme Court · 1949
- Hart v. Van ZandtTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Lenger v. Physician's General Hospital, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1970
- Duncan v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Portillo v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1993