Legal Opinion
Portillo v. United States
District Court, W.D. Texas
Decided March 19, 1993No. 3:91-cr-00014PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
HUDSPETH, Chief Judge.
This is a civil action for damages for medical malpractice under the Federal Tort Claims; Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671 et seq. This Court has jurisdiction under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b). After conducting discovery, the Defendant filed motions to dismiss and a motion for summary judgment. The Court finds that certain claims asserted by the Plaintiff must be dismissed because of the Plaintiffs failure to comply, with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 2675. As to the remaining claims, the Court finds…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bowles v. BourdonTexas Supreme Court · 1949
- Lenger v. Physician's General Hospital, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1970
- Gary L. Adams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- C. Richard Brown and Karen Brown v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, James G. Bryan, and Keith DendyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sheeley v. Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998
- Bryan v. StevensDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2001
- Portillo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Bryan v. StevensDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2001
- Lang v. American Samoa GovernmentHigh Court of American Samoa · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.