Seawell v. Brame
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
There was ample evidence to require the submission of plaintiff's case to the jury. Indeed, defendants abandoned their exceptions and assignments of error relating to the denial of their motions for judgment of nonsuit in failing to discuss them in their (joint) brief. Rule 28, Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 254 N.C. 783, 810.
We pass, without discussion, all of defendants’ assignments of error except those relating to the basis of our decision. Defendants’ other assignments of error are of such nature that discussion thereof would be of no assistance in conducting the next trial.
Plain…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Spivey v. NewmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Pridgen v. . GibsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Parker v. GuntherSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960
- Taylor v. Monongahela Railway Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. Lawrence Daniel Caldwell, A/K/A Thomas E. Morgan, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Eros A. Timm, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- State v. BestSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. WadeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Robinson v. JP Stevens and Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Barrett v. Coast Range PlywoodOregon Supreme Court · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.