Legal Opinion

Bishop v. Crowther

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 9, 1981No. 80-2713PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

Defendant MFA Insurance Company (MFA) appeals from a declaratory judgment finding that defendant Lee Crowther is entitled to full rights and benefits under the Homeowner’s Insurance Policy issued to him by MFA and from the garnishment judgment entered in favor of plaintiff Robert Bishop against MFA in the amount of $175,000, plus interest and costs.

The facts underlying this appeal are: In 1973, MFA issued its Homeowner’s Insurance Policy to Lee Crowther and his wife on their home in Joliet, Illinois. In the autumn of that year, Lee Crowther entered into a contract with Kofoid and Pilón to…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Maryland Casualty Co. v. PeppersIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Thornton v. PaulIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Crane v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Reis v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  5. Krutsinger v. Illinois Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1957

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Vernon Gray v. Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
  2. Garcia v. American Physicians Insurance Exchange, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1991
  3. MFA Mutual Insurance v. Crowther, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  4. Dowse v. Southern Guaranty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  5. Stevenson v. SamkowAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API