Johnson v. Commonwealth

Opinion by

President Judge Crumlish, Jr.,

The Unemployment Compensation Board of Review affirmed a referee’s decision denying benefits to Samuel E. Johnson and assessing a fault overpayment. We affirm.

Johnson, an automobile mechanic, was laid off and initially awarded benefits. Subsequently, he was accused of receiving remuneration at another job1 while collecting benefits.

*17Tlie referee denied benefits, concluding that Johnson Was not unemployed under Sections 4012 and 4(u)3 of the Unemployment Compensation Law. Johnson contends that he received no monetary remuneration for his services.4 We…