Legal Opinion

Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Miedama

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 22, 1976No. Appeal, No. 1871 C.D. 1975PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Crumlish, Jr.,

Harriet Miedama (Claimant) has appealed an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review affirming the referee’s denial of benefits.

The referee made the following findings:

“1. Claimant was last employed by the Plaza Travel Agency as a Travel Agency Manager at $185.00 per week, from March of 1971 to October 25, 1974, at which time she had'a valid separation.
“2. While in an active claim status, and on or about February 1, 1975, the claimant entered into an agreement to tender her services to the Come Travel agency.
“3. Business cards were made up in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Laswick v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Marr v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Latella v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Jeter v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Kelly v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Myers v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Johnson v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API