Legal Opinion

Nance v. Crockett County

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided December 15, 2015No. 14-1264Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

J. DANIEL BREEN, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

INTRODUCTION

On October 7, 2014, the Plaintiff, Jerry A. Nance, brought this action against the Defendant, Crockett County, Tennessee (the “County”), alleging violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C. § 201, et seq. (the “FLSA”). (Docket Entry “D.E.” 1.) Before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for partial summary judgment. (D.E. 23, 25.)

STANDARD OF REVIEW

Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API