Legal Opinion

Gargano v. Stop & Shop Supermarket Co.

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided December 11, 2006PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMerrick, J.

The minor plaintiff brought this action by her mother and next friend for injuries caused by a M in defendant Stop & Shop’s supermarket. The case was dismissed pursuant to Mass. R. Civ. P., Rule 33(a), when the plaintiff failed to make timely answers to interrogatories. A judge allowed the plaintiff’s Mass. R Civ. R, Rule 60(b), motion to vacate the dismissal, and the case proceeded to trial. The plaintiff obtained a judgment on the merits against defendant Stop & Shop in the amount of $5,502.00. The defendant has appealed on a charge of error in the courf s pretrial allowance of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Berube v. McKesson Wine & Spirits Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  2. Twin Fires Investment, LLC v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  3. Gath v. M/A-Com, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  4. Greenleaf v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
  5. Chu Tai v. City of BostonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nieves v. MarraquinMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2009
  2. Kraytsberg v. KaplanMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API